Date rape, marital rape, we’ve all heard of such criminal incidents at one point or another. But it’s actually more complex than we may think.
Article 266-A of “The Anti-Rape Law of 1997” defines what constitutes rape, as follows:
"1) By a man who shall have carnal knowledge of a woman under any of the following circumstances:
"a) Through force, threat, or intimidation;
"b) When the offended party is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious;
"c) By means of fraudulent machination or grave abuse of authority; and
"d) When the offended party is under twelve (12) years of age or is demented, even though none of the circumstances mentioned above be present.”
Have you ever heard of birth rape? It’s when a doctor or nurse probes into a woman’s vagina, whether using an instrument or his / her hand, without permission, while she is undergoing labor. The problem occurs when in the midst of these procedures, the woman is not treated in a respectable manner, rendering her feeling violated or offended.
Writer Amity Reed comments on a birth rape article by Tracy Clark-Flory by explaining that birth rape involves “Fingers, hands, suction cups, forceps, needles and scissors … these are the tools of birth rape and they are wielded with as much force and as little consent, as if a stranger grabbed a passer-by off the street and tied her up before having his way with her.”
Given the aforementioned parameters on what counts as birth rape, do you think these can be considered as sexual affront on a woman?
We’d love to know what you think. Leave a comment below.
You may also want to read:
• October 5, 2010. Bonnie Rochman. “Is “Birth Rape” for Real?” healthland.time.com
•“The Anti-Rape Law of 1997” chanrobles.com
• July 1, 2011. “Birth-Rape: Feminists’ Constant Expanding of the Definition of Rape Has Created 24 Different Types of Rape” inmalafide.com
• September 10, 2010. “Birth Rape” Rhetoric is Ugly, Misleading. bigthink.com
Photo by The U.S. National Archives via flickr creative commons